WIN the 4 BOOKS in the BLACK SUN'S DAUGHTER WEEK THREE ENTRY

Wednesday, April 7, 2010

Outlander Series - What's All the Fuss About?

It is a gorgeous day here in New England; but I am inside reading free books, stories and excerpts on a site http://bittenbybooks.com/. Am I crazy telling you about other sites; no, I think if I give you info you want you will appreciate it.   Besides, I am sure you don't want to just read my ideas all the time.

And, I am pretty sure you want to hear about other ideas and genres than just Vampires.  So, I was thinking about one of my favorite series, Diana Gabaldon's Voyager series.  Last fall saw the release of the seventh in this long-lived series, An Echo in The Bone.  I think I first read the original novel, Outlander.  in 1994. It was originally published in 1991. And, there are few series I will buy at new release prices for Kindle or in hardcover.  These I will (of course then I have to watch the Kindle price drop on a weekly basis. Aside from a great, hot romance these are really well researched and discuss life the way we do.  Questions you may have thought of about the past are answered candidly.

The main female character, Claire is strong in this series, but I must say it is the man, Jamie Fraser who will steel your breath.  Back then we used to say that Mel Gibson would have been the perfect actor to play Jamie.  But, now, it would have to be someone younger, as Jamie is in his early twenties when the series begins.  Gabaldon says she knows just what the characters look like but is not very familiar       with the actors available today (except she doesn't favor Ms. Bullock as Claire).  She points out that many of her readers are  quite sure of who should be which character and have sent many videos in to her which she has collected on her You Tube Channel.  If you have read these books and wondered yourself who would be the perfect Jamie or Claire you owe it to yourself to look -- Beannee73's is particularly on the mark. Another suggests an actor who looks an awful lot like the blond Jesus print my mother (and a good many other's) had hanging up my entire childhood.  It would be akin to thinking of your parents in the throes of passion -- that is, it would ruin the experience for me!  Isn't it a pain when you have imagined characters for so long and they cast the "wrong" actor! I am interested in your thoughts here too.

But, as the books have progressed so have the characters in age and time so while it is quite lovely that Claire and Jamie have been together through these seven books, it is now a read where passion is not the first thing about them.  They are still great fun to read but the hot spark has been snuffed by the aches and pains of people my own age. But, to have kept this going for almost 20 years, that is something to feel proud about! There is a spin off series as well: the Lord John Grey novels and a few other bits and pieces.

Diana Gabaldon's Outlander Series, snagged wholesale from her website:

  • Outlander (also titled Cross Stitch) Published: June 1, 1991
  • Dragonfly in Amber Published: July 1, 1992
  • Voyager Published: December 1, 1993
  • Drums of Autumn Published: December 30, 1996
  • The Fiery Cross Published: November 6, 2001
  • A Breath of Snow and Ashes Published: September 27, 2005
    Winner: Quill Award Winner: Corinne International Book Prize
  • An Echo in the Bone Published: September 22, 2009
  • Book eight, Outlander series No Publication Date 

Book Cover: http://66.147.244.179/~dianagab/IPK/IPK.html 

    Tuesday, April 6, 2010

    Reopening the Vein of DIscussion

    So,  yes.  what do they eat.  Obviously Vampires are a different species altogether or they have had some amazing transformation that causes a need for the consumption of blood.  In my previous post (4-5-2010) I went over Twilight and the Argeneaus as well as a few other series.

    I certainly do not profess to have read all the series or novels or to even remember each nuance of what I have read.  Partly what Vampires consume and how has to do with whether they are good beings or bad beings.  Frequency of consumption is usually dictated by age with older vampires often needing less.

    Back to good vs bad (baaaaad) vampires; good vampires either drink animal blood, take from a partner with whom they have bonded (in which case it increases sexual pleasure), take from humans but erase their memories and do not take too much.  Grey area vampires, and the grey is usually their own soul (or not) searching, find criminals and "drain" them; some also keep "pets (humans from whom they take blood but not enough to damage them).  The latter are grey because they do not consider the humans as equals but as a food source.

    Vampires who are bad, who have "blood lust" or have otherwise gone rogue, have no regard as other than a food source or herd.  They go so far as to consider themselves superior to humans and that humans do exist to serve the Vampire's needs.  Therefore they may keep a human pet, but just as easily "go too far."

    This is often the attitude in the Sookie Stackhouse series by Charlaine Harris, and it is more pronounced in the HBO series True Blood which is derived therefrom.  In this series, Japanese scientists have invented a blood substitute that sustains Vampires.  This has enabled Vampires to "come out of the coffin."  The Vampire world is divided into regions and districts and even states.  These have sherrifs, kings, queens and magisters who administer justice, But it certainly isn;t the justice we have come to expect.  In this new world where we know about Vampires there are those who only drink bottled and those who drink both but rarely if ever kill. The remaining vampires do not believe they should have come out and prefer to live and dine as they have for centuries.

     In the Brotherhood of Blood series by Kathryn Smith the first vampire in the first book, Be Mine Tonight, to whom we are introduced is "Chapel" of whom the readers learn that the "pint of pig's blood he had consumed earlier sustained and strengthened him, but it had been like eating turnip when what one really craved was chocolate.  Earlier he had had to step outside to clear the scent of human from his senses."
    Smith,  Kathryn: Be Mine Tonight, Avon 2006, Chapter 3, Location 443 - 449

    Clearly, Chapel, like Ms. Meyer's "vegetarian vampires,"  the Cullen Family, can survive on animal blood but would like a nice juicy person.  Also, Ms. Smith's cadre of vampires can eat and drink human food and not just humans.

    I first became interested in this subject on seeing some people flame Stephenie Meyer on web forums.  People seemed to believe (as I DO NOT) that she had wholesale lifted the stories out of this or that series.  I thought that perhaps there were similarities between series because there are certain questions about the creatures that are usually rather vital to the story, and among these are food and blood, and another is origin. There are other characteristics:  ability to propagate, taking a human lover or bonded mate, etc., that are common throughout the genre.  In fact it would be pretty hard for one novel or series NOT to share commonalities with others.


    Thanks so much for reading.  It is so much fun to explore these ideas.
    Stay Tuned for More of The Dining Habits of Vampires
     
    '' Members of the "Boston Direct Action Project" dressed as vampires impersonate public relations associates of the World Bank, Washington DC. *'''Source:''' The Photographer *'''Photographer:''' Matt Osborn *'''Taken: 19 April 2005 
        * License: CC-by-2.0 Photoshopped by Stephanie Takes-Desbiens, 4/6/2010

    Monday, April 5, 2010

    Who's for Dinner!

    “Ask me the most basic question, ‘What do we eat?’”


    In Twilight, the wildly successful film based on Stephenie Meyers, the Twilight Saga this is how (in paraphrase) Edward admits to Bella that his “special” diet is not because he has an autoimmune disease, or because his parents raised him on totally organic vegetables, but because he is, as she has suspected, a vampire. This scene does not occur in Twilight, the book but is part of the online draft of Midnight Sun by Stephenie Meyers an account of Twilight from Edward’s Point of View.



    Of course, as any reasonable fan of the paranormal romance genre knows, Edward and his family don’t consume human blood, although it is a struggle. They consider themselves “vegetarians,” which in this instance means they only eat (non-human) animals. And, they are also unable to digest regular food. At one point in Midnight Sun (only available online see below) Edward eats a morsel of pizza and is disgusted.



         It was as slimy and chunky and as repulsive as any human food. I chewed stiffly and 
         swallowed,  trying to keep the grimace off my face. The gob of food moved slowly and   
         uncomfortably down my throat. I sighed as I thought of how I would have to choke it 
         back up later. Disgusting.
         p. 234: www.stepheniemeyer.com/pdf/midnightsun_partial_draft4.pdf


    How do other vampires handle food? First, let’s assume that all vampires must drink blood.Otherwise they wouldn't be vampires.


    I wanted to start with Anne Rice. Her vampires did drink their victims to death, and they also drank the blood of animals when necessary. I can’t remember (and cannot find the book) if they were unable to eat or if they just didn’t wish to. I also cannot remember if they drank the humans out of existence because they couldn't stop or if it was for enjoyment.


    In the Argeneau Series and Rogue Hunter Series by Lyndsay Sands the vampire does not have the digestive process altered that much, I guess because they can eat and drink. These Atlanteans (from Atlantis rather than Atlanta) were created due to the introduction of nanos, small, self-replicating body repairing machines. The Nanos require blood to work. However, the vampires (or as they prefer to be called, Immortals) can eat and drink regular food. It is just that after hundreds of years it becomes a bore, as does sex. However, a renewed interest in both food and sex emerges when the vampire meets his/her human or vampire life mate. These vamps have the power of compulsion and the ability to read minds, except that of their true mate.

    According to their laws, the Argeneau vampires cannot kill humans and they who do are considered rogue and hunted down. Instead, the Argeneau series vamps drink bagged blood provided, quite handily, by their own multinational blood-banking corporation. There are, in this series, a few who are not able to drink the bagged blood. They are allowed to feed from humans.


    In the Love at Stake Series from , Vampires can drink bottled blood, in fact there are many flavored types available as well as “bleer” a blood beer. There are two kinds of vampires: The good guys who drink bottled blood, and they who consider that beneath them. Only the latter continue to prey on and kill humans.They do not seem to consume human food.


    Kate McAllistair’s Dark Ones, once they find their "beloved" (an immortalized life mate) can only drink their blood. Prior to that they do need blood to survive and I believe it comes from humans.


    Enough for this post.  I hope to continue in this vein (tee-hee) for my next post. It is such an interesting topic, but I don't think you wanted to read a dissertation when you logged in.

    Sunday, April 4, 2010

    "Easter" Eggs -- What Is More Paranormal Than The Secret of Life?

    My Dad, gone eleven years now, would have been 82 last week.  His parents were both ethnic Greeks from Turkey, having left in the diaspora written about in Egugenides Middlesex. My mom was Italian-American  of northern Italian parents who left for the golden streets of America.   Gross simplification of the facts there, but to be honest, there is no complicated story because we were never told the real tales.  I did not even know my "Greek" grandparents were technically "Turks" until my mid-thirties: it is not a good thing to be at all Turkish when your father is Greek-Orthodox.  Like a line extending up from Greece to the Artic reaches, many of these traditions overlap with former Soviet-block /Iron Curtain countries.

    So, although this year Easter for Western and Eastern traditions fall on the same day, we usually had Easter twice. For me, Easter was largely about candy, and hardboiled eggs.  We dyed our eggs for Greek Easter with Rit Dye Cardinal Red, although our Armenian friends achieved a deep red with red onion skins.  I guess my family believed in better living through chemistry. On Greek Easter we would get together with all my Dad's side of the family.  Greek family get-togethers have a sense memory of their own that I can almost taste. We always had Lamb, if it was at my Aunt's house it had been roasted into texture of stale, old jujubes.  My Mother's was better; in fact she was better at the Greek dishes than most of my Greek relatives -- I guess she had something to prove.

    left: Viktar Pałściuk http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Belarusian_Easter_Eggs.jpg




    below: Walter J. Pilsak, Waldsassen http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Eierhaerten.jpg


    But ever present were the red eggs.  Minus the lovely designs our eggs were somewhat brighter than these Belarusian examples. God, we ate so many eggs we must have set off sulphur alarms the next day. After our huge meal, we would all take our eggs and do the tapping game (read more about this at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egg_tapping).  Whoever had the egg which remained intact went on to the next person but it has been a long time since I sat around the table with my Greek cousins (too many named Peter).  It was thrilling in the pre-video game days.  I was surprised, later, to find that this was a common game to play across many cultures. 


    Tsoureki recipeLike these at left I found on http://www.chiff.com/a/easter-greece.htm, ours were often baked into our Greek Easter bread.  The bread contained a pine flavor from a pine gum we called mastica.  I have theorized it has a wheat strengthening property because the bread had a somewhat cake-like consistency. It may be that Greek wheat was softer than our own hard red wheat here in the States.

    My father, who was very religious, told us that there were many layers to the egg's symbolism:
    • The egg represented the stone that was in front of Christ's tomb
    • It was, being the source of new life a [unfertilized and cooked] symbol of the same.  In Greek class I learned that the Greek word for "egg" was a masculine noun. Go figure. But, can you imagine before there was an understanding of fertility how magical it must have been to see a chick or other animal hatch out of an unbroken sphere? 
    • It also represented the body in the tomb (the yolk entombed in the white). 
    • It also represented a great source of healthy nutrition and was prohibited during Lent. 

    So, like many symbols and festivals, those associated with non-Christian practices were co-opted by the Church and prior meanings were buried or at best supressed.   Maybe prior practices also allowed people to keep some of their practices and beliefs without risking the noose as early Christianity was somewhat brutal.

    For example, "She was dying eggs to use in unholy rites." "No, I was dying eggs to celebrate the rebirth of Christ!"

    Our eggs were red because, the sun was red at dawn and (new) Easter represented a new dawn for humanity, and (old) Spring a new dawn for the earth.  Red was the color of  (new) Christ's blood, Passover blood (Old Testament), the blood of the woman giving birth (old).  Also, for us, living in Upstate New York, Easter was rarely snow free, so any color, especially red, was delightful.

    From About.com "Red eggs (in Greek: kokkina avga, κόκκινα αυγά, pronounced KOH-kee-nah ahv-GHAH) are perhaps the brightest symbol of Greek Easter, representing the blood of Christ and rebirth." http://greekfood.about.com/od/greekcookingtips/ht/redeggs.htm.  They were certainly pretty too look at out Cardinal Red Eggs but heavens alone know what the red dye did to our bodies.  The above citation also tells us how to dye eggs naturally, using onion skins.

    Also, a friend and blog follower shared this with me: http://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/notes.php?id=172419479791 .  This is an excellent account of the symbolism of Eggs across time and traditions.


    Is birth any less amazing and miraculous now that we know some of the mysteries behind the emergence of the chick, the egg, the babe from the womb or the blades of grass from the ground?
    I think that the paranormal, lives in this mystery which even as we learn how it works, becomes more mysterious as it hangs onto the most important secret and truth - what animates the egg, whence the spark of life?

    Saturday, April 3, 2010

    Gnome Body Gnows the Trouble I've Seen

    Lovely friends,  it is a fine day here in New England so here I am sitting at my computer thinking about paranormal romance and such.  It is a bit less than ideal!
    I suspect, and hope you are outside, wearing sunblock of course, and are reading this in the evening.

    Look for me several days a week right here; even as the weather warms.  Today, though, the garden calls.  I have an antique garden gnome, so ugly it is guaranteed to scare away bad juju. 

    He is made out of cast iron; I think gnomes work with metals so that may be okay.  But, I know any faeries living nearby won't be too happy with me. His metallic nature also makes him weigh a ton.  That's a good thing as we experience very high winds.

    Interesting how there are similar creatures in most cultures, and including most of the paranormal's demography (or would it be demonography)?

    In the film Twilight, Bella looks through web sites from several cultures and finds evidence of vampires in each.  In Brown's Lost Symbol ancient demonic symbols from around the world retain their meaning to some even today. And, fairy tales from around the world share demons, dragons, witches and characters to numerous to categorize. Shape shifters, faeries, gnomes, dwarfs, witches, and more abound. Even isolated cultures have similar paranormal creatures in their mythology.  Is it evidence of existence,  the human brain's similar explanation for similar stimuli, or something else?

    To paraphrase the bard, there are more things in heaven and earth  than are dreamt of in my cosmology. I better go put him outside to scare some away!

    Friday, April 2, 2010

    Loss and Power in Love

    Well, my Kindle broke and the new Kindle just came.  I cannot express how lost I was without a book! I do have a few technical manuals I am supposed to be reading but - my goodness those real books are so inconvenient.

    That is a bit off topic I guess.

    I was thinking today about a friend with whom I was discussing New Moon (Twilight Saga).  I am going to have to assume that you know the story,or have at least seen one of the films.  New Moon spoilers ahead! As two more "mature" women it is probably hard to recall the angst of teen love.  I do recall it as extremely painful.  I asked my friend if prior to her relationship with her husband she had had any serious relationships. She said she had serious relationships  but she had never lost herself in one as Bella seems to do after Edward leaves her. My friend (really, my friend, not me) said she had  had enough sense of self and family  she could see the relationship didn't have a future .  I am sure she did weep at the end but knowing her I imagine she put it away, dusted her self off and went on her way.

    I did lose myself and would spend months pining and weeping  and believing I was worthless without a boyfriend and especially that one particular boyfriend who would break up, get back together, date others, be committed.  So maybe I can understand the tragic, Cathy-on-the-moors-seeking-Heathcliffe, side of Bella.  I think my friend's way was probably much better.

    But why does Bella lose herself in Edward?  What triggers her becoming so wrapped up?  She seems fairly sure of herself; she knows her parents love her.  She doesn't believe herself extraordinary in any way and seems intent on living a life of mediocrity until she meets Edward.   After Edward leaves she becomes a total zombie for several months feeling betrayed, bereft and any other alliterative descriptor that begins with "be."  Then she enters a relationship where she is the stronger of the two parties.  Jacob is the one wanting her; she has the power. Once again, by turning into a wolf Jacob becomes more extraordinary than her.

    [I have experienced this in paranormal romances more than other stories.  The heroine is dead set against the guy and the next moment she whipping off her panties (not Bella). I suppose it is a device for getting from the necessary tension and antipathy  to that first kiss or the
    bedroom.]


    The later premise is that Bella is mature enough to get married is somewhat dashed by her behavior until she and Edward get back together. Noone can mature that quickly.

     Bella spent a lot of time taking care of her mom and even moves to Forks so her mom will be happy.  She stays out of Charlie's life to a  degree too.  Sh seems to hold herself back from the people who love or like her; except Edward with whom she has a tortured relationship with scant physical contact outside of cuddling on her bed most nights ( a compromise between her era and his).  So she totally immerses herself in Edward, eats, breathes and sleeps him, and when he leaves her pole has gone and she  either sits and ponders or sleeps and screams. She has lost herself by giving her teenage self over to him; her parents don't seem to have any idea as to what they could do or have done to make her stronger; her mom because in this relationship she is the child and Charlie because he is emotionally stuck.  They don't even talk about boys and he doesn't seem to know about her thing with Edward.

    What are your thoughts? Do girls who are not dating vampires still have this experience?

    Kindle & Accessories